| Writing on the wall - A Palestine in the making. |
|
Paranoia as State policy: Indian Muslims Branded "Internal Security Risk" On May 23rd, the Government
of India (GOI) released an extraordinary report on national
security that could be considered the most important official
document issued by the current Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led
government of Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
This report attempts to
assert that the entire 150 million member Indian Muslim
community (through so-called fundamentalist movements and
mushrooming madrasas) is a threat to India's internal
security. Bangladeshi migrants have been identified as the
second major source of insecurity. Their numbers have been put
at "15 million" (it is not clear how this figure has
been arrived at). These migrants are Muslims as well and, if
the GOM is to be believed, they are all busy leading lives as
agents of Pakistan's military intelligence (ISI), or as
smugglers, criminals and agents of foreign powers. In addition
to Pakistan and Afghanistan, the usual suspects, these foreign
powers are identified as "certain Muslim countries":
namely Saudi Arabia, Sudan and "Gulf" countries.
Ironically, the very same GOI is currently going out of its
way to improve relations with Muslim and Gulf countries. The Hindu
communalist may gloat over the massacre of more than a
thousand Muslims in Gujarat. But he has betrayed the very
faith of which he claims to be a devotee. He has disowned
Gandhi and rejected his legacy of non violence. Moreover, he
has justified the bestial killings and looting as a measure of
revenge for the gruesome torching of the kar sewaks in the
ill-fated Sabarmati Express. The Ghanchis who did it were
illiterate, uncivilised brutes, who were Muslims in name but
absolutely ignorant of what Islam stands for. They must pay
for their crimes against the helpless, innocent women and
children and, according to the Quran, in their life hereafter
they will burn in hell forever. But for the madness of those
few, why were the innocent Muslims in different parts of
Gujarat taken out of their homes and slaughtered mercilessly;
their businesses, homes and properties looted by Hindu
criminals? In what way were they responsible for what happened
in Godhra? The only answer is that they were so brutalised
because they were Muslims. It is happening all the time these
days. Some Muslims misbehave with some Hindus and the rest of
the Muslims have to bear the brunt of the angry Hindus
elsewhere. It is thus time for Indian Muslims as a whole to
think seriously as to what they should do with those Muslims
whose crimes bring about a carnage of such horrendous
magnitude on the rest of them. Those who know nothing of Islam
are bringing disaster after disaster on the real followers of
the religion. The sins of some lunatics in the community are
being visited upon the whole people who are completely
innocent of such terrible brutalities. This is the worst kind
of travesty of justice that Muslims are being made to suffer
in India. Instead of confronting the criminal Muslims and
saving the rest of the community from the consequences of
their lunacy, there are some Muslim fanatics who are working
up the spirit of retaliation and generating further ill-will
against Hindus. This will cause more alienation between the
two communities. The Hindus too are, no less, guilty of
fostering and furthering it. Some of them have outdone the
worst of Muslim criminals. But while they can get away with
it, Muslims in India become the ultimate sufferers. They must,
therefore, find a way out to safeguard themselves against the
possibility of a calamity such as the one Muslims in Gujarat
have suffered. I have written enough about the part Jinnah
played in bringing about the division of the country which has
ruined Indian Muslims in every respect. His propagation of the
pernicious two-nation theory erected such barriers of hate
between Hindus and Muslims that it gave a fatal blow to
Mahatma Gandhi’s mission of Hindu-Muslim unity. Abul Kalam
Azad cried himself hoarse about how this would strike the
death-knell for Indian Muslims. But nobody heeded him. After
Partition, most of those who took over the leadership of
Indian Muslims continued the policy of confrontation against
Hindus. They created one crisis after another on issues which
had little relevance to the day-to-day existence of Indian
Muslims. The result of their aggressive utterances and
senseless activities hardly brought any relief to Indian
Muslims. On the contrary, their repeated agitations brought in
their wake Hindu backlash, causing more misery to Muslims
everywhere. More than a decade ago, some of them mounted a
countrywide protest against the Supreme Court judgment in the
Shah Bano case. They forced the then government of Rajiv
Gandhi to amend the Constitution and enact a law to give
better maintenance to divorced Muslim women. Instead, it
encouraged more divorces and threw thousands of young Muslim
women on the streets. Worse still, it provoked communal Hindus
to organise the Ramjanmabhoomi movement to reassert their
supremacy in their motherland. Of late, the so-called jehadis
have emerged, who in the name of Islam are murdering innocent
Hindus day after day, particularly in Jammu and Kashmir.
Backed by Pakistan, their murderous adventures are adding
constantly to Hindu hatred against Muslims. In last week’s
Outlook, Dilip D’Souza mentions his conversation with a
young Hindu student in Sabarmati Ashram. He writes, the young
man told him: "‘Eighty per cent of Muslims are
terrorists," his lower lip quivering in rage. "They
have attacked us here for 55 years."’ He went on and
on, avers D’Souza. That is the mindset of many Hindus who
are becoming increasingly hostile to Muslims. Some openly talk
of enacting a Bosnia here. There are others who quietly
propagate that unless Hindus get rid of Muslims, India will
never prosper. As a result, a number of Hindus are beginning
to look upon Muslims as undesirable Indians. Among the elite
and those from the middle-class as well, many Hindus talk of
keeping away from Muslims. They have become resentful and even
averse to them. Partnerships or collaborations with Muslims in
business enterprises are being withdrawn. There is a threat of
boycott all around. Too much distrust is growing against the
Muslims. Isn’t this in complete contrast to what Swami
Vivekananda has said: "Our watchword, then, should be
acceptance and not exclusion. Not only toleration, for
so-called toleration is often blasphemy, and I do not believe
in it. I believe in acceptance. Why should I tolerate?
Toleration means that I think that you are wrong and I am just
allowing you to live. Is it not blasphemy to think that you
and I are allowing others to live? I accept all religions that
were in the past and worship with them all." A number of
Muslims also persist in their attitude of segregation from
Hindus. They discourage social contact with them. They wrongly
believe that their religion prohibits them to trust or
collaborate with them. They distort Quranic injunctions and
misrepresent the prophetic traditions. There is no desire on
their part to develop a meaningful relationship with Hindus.
Hence the gulf between the two communities is widening. For
almost a decade, Muslims have been fighting for Babri masjid.
But strangely, they seem unconcerned that hundreds of mosques
meanwhile have been destroyed in Gujarat and some parts of
Maharashtra like Malegaon. Why is this onslaught taking place
on their sacred places? Muslims have to go into the causes and
strive to bring about a more congenial atmosphere. Those, who
are playing with fire in the name of protecting Islam, must
give serious thought to the fact that confrontationist bravado
is now proving utterly counterproductive. Muslims are becoming
victims of this hate and counter-hate phenomenon, which is
also harming the larger interests of the country. Both sides
must sit together with leaders who believe in collaboration
and harmony. They must make an earnest effort to break once
and for all, the walls of hostility so that more bloodshed can
be avoided and every Indian is assured of a stable and secure
environment which will bring prosperity to all. They must shed
their in-built prejudices which breed antagonism and resolve
to stop this terrible alienation between the two religious
groups, which, even the RSS admits, consists of ‘blood
brothers’. A
majority of Muslims are supporters of the international fight
against mindless terrorism, but have also opposed the
US-backed military campaign in Afghanistan which killed
hundreds of innocents and have been warning of global
instability if the United States attacks Iraq. According to
them, the issues such as Israel's occupation of Palestinian
territory and Western sanctions against Iraq, Iran, Libya and
Sudan has forced some Muslims to 'retaliate' ... through acts
of terror, hitting out blindly at the innocents as well as the
guilty.
Typically, the
solution prevalent these days is to physically fight against
the enemy, the Islamic civilization, but unfortunately, the
fact remains that anything short of total genocide, the
terrorists cannot be militarily defeated. There is practically
no effort to win the hearts and minds of the Muslims, In fact,
everything is being done to alienate them further, to anger
and frustrate them, and to ensure there will be a constant and
probably increasing supply of recruits to terrorism. ... And
so, there will be no end to Muslim terrorism. Allah’s message to his creatures is clear, unequivocal. It has been put in a beautiful couplet by Maulana Rumi, the greatest Sufi that Islam produced: Too baraaye wasl kardan aamadi Na baraaya fasl kardan aamadi (You’ve
been sent to unite people...You’ve not been sent to divide
people.)
|
| By Zafarul-Islam Khan |